President Trump's recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital has done
more than upend 70 years of American policy. It has underlined how far the Jews
still are from international acceptance on their own terms, rather than as
others would have them. It indicates that this lack of acceptance is still
fundamental to how the world relates to the Jews.
There has been a raging argument between archeologists these past 30
years about how much historical truth there is in the Biblical stories. A
consensus has slowly emerged that King David was a historical figure and that
he lived in Jerusalem 3,000 years ago; the argument still rages around the
question if his Jerusalem was a small and insignificant village or perhaps
something much grander. Some historians insist the Jews emerged as a real
nation with their own culture only once their elite had been exiled to Babylon,
where they collected, collated and edited the Biblical stories for the first
time: those would be the people who claimed "By the rivers of Babylon/there
we sat down/there we wept/as we remembered Zion" – Zion being one of the
names of Jerusalem. There is no way to make sense of the New Testament unless
one accepts that Jesus was preaching and died in Jerusalem, the capital of the
Jews. In the 2nd century Hadrian ploughed Jerusalem and built a Roman
town in its stead precisely because he assumed that would put an end to the
pesky Jews.
Yet at no point in the past 2,000 years of history did any significant
political power ever see the real city of Jerusalem as a Jewish capital. In one
of history's remarkable twists, British forces conquered Jerusalem exactly a
century ago this week. At the time a majority of Jerusalemites were Jews, and
had been for at least 40 years if not 80, yet the British carefully
gerrymandered all municipal elections to ensure there'd never be a Jewish
mayor. During
30 years of British rule there were a number of proposals to partition the
land; none of them ever suggested Jewish control over Jerusalem. The partition
plan eventually adopted by the UN 70 years ago last week invented an
unprecedented departure from the universal principle of sovereignty, the Corpus
Separatum, to ensure the Jews – still a majority of the city's population –
would not control Jerusalem.
Deliberations on implementing this oddity went on at the UN years after
Israel and Jordan had divided the city between them.
After the Six Day War Israel's leaders assumed the Christian world,
which the West could still have been considered to be, would refuse to accept
Jewish control of the city. They were talking about religion and its expression
in Western civilization, not about international laws.
The near-universal rejection of President Trump's recognition of the
plain fact that Jerusalem is Israel's capital looks far more sinister than a
mere disagreement over the best way to promote a notional peace agreement. This
is reinforced by the blatant flimsiness of the reasons for the rejection and
their distance from reality. It looks to this Israeli as a continuation of an
ancient insistence that the Jews must be what the others say, and that for them
to be accepted they must behave as the others demand. It can't be that
Jerusalem is the capital of the Jewish State, because that would mean that the
Jews really have returned to national normality, and that they are a nation and
state as all the other 200 states are.
The louder the howls are, the more pervasive the condemnations, the more
it seems to many regular, middle of the road Israelis that our place among the
nations is still not yet finally accepted nor sincere.
Postscript: the cool response of some American Jews to the recognition is also a worthy theme for analysis. Not today, however.
I think the Romans saw Jerusalem as the Jewish capital. They didn't like it much, and eventually changed it. But this was within your 2000 year boundary.
ReplyDelete